Airplane Brain Quiz!

brainquiz.png

Here's a tidbit I feel like sharing: Yesterday, I was flying from LA to SF - the last leg of a excruciating 22-hour journey back home from Israel. During that 15 minute window before landing, when my kindle had to be turned off just in case its electric presence flummoxed my Southwest airplane, I flipped through the inflight magazine.

And found this gem of sort-of neuroscience: a Brain Quiz (aka an advert for something in a pill bottle called "AlphaBrain". The website for AlphaBrain is so full of dubious neuro-technobabble that I'm categorically refusing to provide a link.)

 2013-02-21 12.45.28

With a befuddlement mostly provided by substantial amounts of jetlag (still feeling it. woohoo), I stared longest at question 3:

2013-02-21 12.43.45

Ready for the answers? Curious which one of the rightmost boxes could possibly be the "most accurate association" with GABA (the major inhibitory neurotransmitter that is involved in just about everything)?

Here it goes.

Acetylcholine:

Mental speed, focus, memory. Commentary: Uh, I guess so. But maybe also muscle movements, seeing as how acetylcholine is THE transmitter at the neuromuscular junction. And I'm not too sure how what "mental speed" means, but acetylcholine is involved in attention, which I guess could work with the focus thing. And screwing with acetylcholine does affect learning/memory/plasticity, so I guess that's fine. Whatever.

Serotonin:

Positive mood. Commentary: Did you know that the vast majority of serotonin release is in the gastrointestinal tract, where it regulates intestinal movements? Mis-regulated intestinal movements sure leaves me in a bad mood. But sure, in the brain, release of serotonin does regulate mood. Drugs that increase serotonin levels in the brain are prescribed as antidepressants (e.g. selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, SSRI's), or used (and abused) as psychedelics (e.g. LSD, mescaline, MDMA).

Dopamine:

Coordination, pleasure, mental drive. Commentary: Pleasure? Ugh. Try "reward-driven learning". Does the coordination come from the loss of movement accompanying the death of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's disease? Not really a loss of coordination, so much as a categorical degeneration of motor control. "Mental drive" likely refers to the deficits in mental acuity, attention, and memory that accompany dopaminergic cell loss in Parkinson's. Also, reduced dopamine concentrations have been associated with ADHD, which could be characterized by less "mental drive". I guess. Maybe.

GABA:

Relaxation, sense of calm. Commentary: GABA, aka gamma-aminobutyric acid, aka the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the CNS. It's diverse roles, reduced to the fact that many potent anesthetics are either GABA receptor agonists or positive modulators  (e.g. alcohol, valium). Oh well. Note: for those interested in the differences in GABAergic inhibition between awake and anesthetized states, I direct you to a great recent publication by Michael Hausser and Matteo Carandini. First author Bilal Halder shows that in the mouse visual system, synaptic inhibition was substantially stronger in awake animals, when compared with anesthetized animals. A fun finding, given the (radically oversimplified) hypothesis that anesthetics work by increasing inhibition within the CNS. Insert spirited discussion about the difference between general changes in GABAergic tone (produced by anesthetics) and temporally/spatially/neuron specific synaptic inhibition (observed in awake conditions, likely disrupted by anesthetics).

Citation: Halder, Hausser and Carandini (2013). "Inhibition dominates sensory responses in the awake cortex." Nature 492, 97-100. Link.

Comment /Source

Astra Bryant

Astra Bryant is a graduate of the Stanford Neuroscience PhD program in the labs of Drs. Eric Knudsen and John Huguenard. She used in vitro slice electrophysiology to study the cellular and synaptic mechanisms linking cholinergic signaling and gamma oscillations – two processes critical for the control of gaze and attention, which are disrupted in many psychiatric disorders. She is a senior editor and the webmaster of the NeuWrite West Neuroblog

True Facts about the Elephant Seal

IMG_4951.jpg

Recently, my lab decided to ditch the whole “doing science on a Friday” thing, and instead, go on a field trip. Roughly 1.5 hours from Stanford lies Ano Nuevo, a California State Park, and home of the largest mainland breeding colony of northern elephant seals in the entire world.(1)

In celebration of a fantastic afternoon filled with elephant seal babies, battles, and breeding, some photos of the Ano Nuevo colony, accompanied by some facts about the elephant seal.

[gallery columns="1" type="slideshow" ids="2525,2535,2537,2539,2549,2551,2547,2559,2545,2543,2553,2555,2561,2557,2563"]

Some Facts(2), Including Facts from Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles(3)

There are two species of elephant seals, northern and southern. Northern elephant seals hang out in the North Pacific, ranging from Baja California to Alaska. Southern elephant seals, being aptly named, inhabit the sub-Antarctic and Artic waters.

Northern elephant seals are very large. The only seal bigger than a northern elephant seal is a southern elephant seal. They can be mistaken for very large logs (this, I have done). Adult males can grow to over 13 feet, 4,500 pounds; females generally weigh in at 10 feet, 1,500 pounds.

A “seal” can belong to one of three families of fin-footed mammals: Odobenidae (walruses), Otariidae (eared seals, e.g. sea lions), or Phocidae (earless, or true seals). Elephant seals are true seals - they don’t have external ear flaps, and they get around while on land by throwing themselves along the ground. It’s hysterical to watch, until you realize that 4,500 pounds of seal is throwing itself at you, at a rate of up 8 miles an hour.

For most of the year, elephant seals are solitary animals, spending most of their time migrating. Ano Nuevo female elephant seals, fitted with satellite tracking equipment, have ventured as far north as Alaska, and as far west as the International Date Line.(4)

The only natural predators of the elephant seals are great white sharks and orcas. Downside: you’re someone’s idea of a tasty snack. Upside: at least it’s an apex predator.

During the 19th century, humans hunted the elephant seal nearly to extinction, for their blubber (used for lamp oil, similarly to whale blubber). Massive conservation efforts, and the invention of electricity, have restored population numbers from less than 100 seals in 1910, to approximately 150,000 today.(5)

During the breeding season, elephant seals throw a beach party during which time males fight to establish dominance, females give birth and then mate with the dominant males. During this time, the elephant seals will abstain from both food and water.

The “elephant” part of the elephant seal’s name is not a comment about its size. Instead, it refers to the adult male elephant seals nose (or proboscis), which, if you want to be excessively polite about it, looks like an elephants trunk. Dominant males inflate their noses to produce a noise that sounds like a cross between a stalling chain saw and an elephant with irritable bowel syndrome.(6)

[quicktime]http://www.stanford.edu/group/neurostudents/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/MVI_4945.mov[/quicktime]

The proboscis isn’t merely the elephant seal’s attempt to win the animal kingdoms Ugliest Mammal Award, the enlarged nose contains highly convoluted nasal cavities (measuring up to 3140 cm2 in an adult male); this enlarged surface area allows elephant seals to reabsorb enough moisture from their exhalations to maintain water balance during the extended fast of the breeding season.(7)

Despite being mammals, and thus needing air to breath, elephant seals spend most of their time deep underwater – 91% of their time at sea is spent diving Our Ano Nuevo docent stated that the movement of an elephant seal descending underwater is be best described as “the same motion as a leaf on the wind”. A 4,500 pound leaf.(8) An “integrative hierarchical Bayesian state-space” model of Southern elephant seal movements, used to quantify how environmental factors influence an individual seal’s movement, is a thing that exists.(9)

Elephant seals hunt deep underwater, where light is scarce. Elephant seals are not equipped with echolocation, one very useful way to find stuff to eat when hunting in very dark water (see: whales). Instead, elephant seals have adapted their vision to be highly sensitive to low intensity light, with peak sensitivity at 485 nm. Coincidentally, 485 nm is the wavelength of bioluminescence produced by the southern elephant seal’s main prey: myctophid fish.(10)

Lastly, antibodies against the parasite Toxoplasma gondii(11) have been detected in Southern elephant seals.(12) Make of that what you will.

Footnotes:

1. For more on Ano Nuevo, including park and colony history and visitor information, go their excellent website. Back to text

2.  Source: Marine Mammal Center; National Geographic. Back to text

3. Methods: A Pubmed search for Mirounga generated an extensive list of journal articles relating to elephant seals. Journal articles were selected from said list on the basis the level of awesomeness evident in the abstract. Back to text

4.  Source: Robinson et al (2012). Foraging behavior and success of a mesopelagic predator in the northeast Pacific Ocean: insights from a data-rich species, the norther elephant seal. PLoS One. 7(5):e36728. Back to text

5 Source: Marine Mammal Center. Back to text

6. Go home evolution, you are drunk. Back to text

7. Source: Huntley et al (1984). The contribution of nasal countercurrent heat exchange to water balance in the northern elephant seal, Mirounga angustirostris. J Exp Biol 113:447-54. Back to text

8. Which is less like a leaf on the wind, an elephant seal, or Walsh, piloting Serenity? Thinking about which option just made you sadder? (This joke is dedicated to K.Bryant) Back to text

9. Source: Bestley et al (2013). Integrative modeling of animal movement: incorporating in situ habitat and behavioural information for a migratory marine predator. Proc Biol Sci. 280(1750):20122262. Back to text

10. Nicely done, evolution. Source: Vacquie-Garcia et al (2012). Foraging in the darkness of the Southern Ocean: Influence of bioluminescence of a deep diving predator. PLoS One: 7(8):e43565. Back to text

11. Let Neuro Ph.D candidate Patrick House remind you all about Toxoplasma gondii. Back to text

12. Source: Rengifo-Herrera et al (2012). Detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in Antarctic pinnipeds. Vet Parasitol: 190(1-2):259-62. Back to text

2 Comments /Source

Astra Bryant

Astra Bryant is a graduate of the Stanford Neuroscience PhD program in the labs of Drs. Eric Knudsen and John Huguenard. She used in vitro slice electrophysiology to study the cellular and synaptic mechanisms linking cholinergic signaling and gamma oscillations – two processes critical for the control of gaze and attention, which are disrupted in many psychiatric disorders. She is a senior editor and the webmaster of the NeuWrite West Neuroblog

Day in the (Grad School) Life: White eggs, brown eggs [updated with results]

[Updated 2/7/13. Click here to skip to results of the hatch] So, I work in a chicken lab.*

What this involves:

  • a weekly delivery of fertilized eggs from a farm located in California's Central Valley;
  • storing the egg delivery in a wine fridge set to 55 degrees celsius
  • two times a week, placing a set of fertilized eggs in an industrial incubator for 3 weeks
  • waiting for a cheeping flock to chicks to hatch

When I first joined my lab, we exclusively used white eggs - ones hatched by white leghorns.

Picture of a white egg

In recent months however, the farm has been sending us eggs that look like this:

Clearly, these are not eggs hatched by a white leghorn (leghorn eggs are described as "pearl white" Source: Henderson's Chicken Breed Chart).

Now, I guess I could go to the internet, and carefully research the egg coloration/patterns of common chicken breeds. If I did that, I would probably be able to narrow down the potential breed of chicken currently growing inside the eggs pictured above. But that would be boring.**

Instead, I'm waiting until Wednesday, when the first batch of mystery brown eggs is scheduled to hatch. I'm betting the chicks in the uniformly brown eggs are either Rhode Islands, the most common layer of brown eggs. As for the speckled eggs, they may be eggs laid by the same breed as the uniformly brown eggs, or they could represent an additional breed.

 

Will all the chicks be the same breed, despite the range in egg coloration? What will that breed be? I'll be finding out (hopefully) on Wednesday.

In conclusion, to quote a post-doc with whom I've been discussing our inability to acquire white eggs: "Aw yeah science!"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Technically, I'm a senior graduate student in the lab of Dr. Eric Knudsen, studying neural mechanisms underlying visual attention in the avian optic tectum. For the historical minded: Eric's lab has a long history of working with another avian model, the barn owl. In recent years, the focus in his lab has begun to shift to work in chickens. Yes, the barn owl is a much more majestic bird than the chicken. **For the scientific aspects of my research, it doesn't really matter what breed of chicken I'm using. Yes, it would be more elegant to use only one breed of bird, but doing experiments with brown eggs is better than not doing experiments with non-existant white eggs.

[Update 2/7/13 - the results of the Brown Egg Hatch]

[gallery type="slideshow" ids="2709,2711,2713,2715,2717,2719,2721,2723,2727"]

 

2 Comments

Astra Bryant

Astra Bryant is a graduate of the Stanford Neuroscience PhD program in the labs of Drs. Eric Knudsen and John Huguenard. She used in vitro slice electrophysiology to study the cellular and synaptic mechanisms linking cholinergic signaling and gamma oscillations – two processes critical for the control of gaze and attention, which are disrupted in many psychiatric disorders. She is a senior editor and the webmaster of the NeuWrite West Neuroblog

What I'm Reading: You patched how many cells now?

Papers1-e1368047993754.jpg

This week, the list of journal articles that I simply must manage tofinish reading includes a technical tour de force from the lab of J Julius Zhu (UVA), entitled “The organization of two new cortical interneuronal circuits”. The co-first authors are Xiaolong Jiang (now a Research Assistant Professor at Baylor College of Medicine) and Guangfu Wang (currently a Research Associate at UVA). Now, I’ve not yet finished reading the paper, so I’m not going to be able to provide the kind of in-depth description of its findings/protocols/implication. (It’s only Wednesday, proper article-reading protocol requires at least 2 days of sitting half-read on my desk.) That being said, folks interested in cortical microcircuits, inhibitory networks, and astonishing efforts in patch-clamp electrophysiology would do well to pick up this article.

The general gist of the study: it is a painstaking examination of the connection patterns of two distinct subtypes of cortical layer 1 inhibitory interneurons. The authors provide convincing evidence for two never-before-described circuits, involving these layer 1 interneurons: one circuit serves to enhance a particular form of activation, known as complex spikes, in downstream layer 5 pyramidal neurons; the other circuit suppresses this same form of activation. The two subtypes of layer 1 interneuron generate their opposing effects on layer 5 pyramidal neuron activity via distinct connections with additional interneurons located in layer 2/3.

As I said, I won’t go in depth into the findings of the paper. Instead, I’d like to focus on the methods, which as I mentioned, could be described as a technical tour de force. But really, tour de force doesn’t quite capture the ludicrous amount of work that must have gone into this study. One the surface, the techniques used are fairly straightforward, patch clamp electrophysiology, a technique first developed by Burt Sakmann and Erwin Neher, and used daily by scientists in research labs across the world (including myself). However, it is in the application of the technique, that this study sets itself apart.

Some background for the non-patch-clamp physiologists in the room. Most of the time, patch-clamp electrophysiologists record from individual neurons within a brain slice; if the experimental question requires, sometimes two neurons will be patched simultaneously. Simultaneous recordings can be technically tricky, requiring a stable recording setup and a skilled patch-clamper; so although dual recordings are pretty common these days, they still represent a technical achievement. Simultaneously recording more than 2 neurons (say 3-4)? A rare event.

To demonstrate the patterns of connectivity between the various subtypes of neurons (those located in layer 1, 2/3 and 5), Jiang, Wang and company patch clamped up to 8 neurons simultaneously. In total, they report testing “14,832 connections between 1,703 L1 neurons, 3,310 L2/3 interneurons and/or 3,394 L5 pyramidal neurons in the cortical slices.”

To best illustrate my reaction to reading this particular sentence, I present my marginalia:

Marginalia: f*%# me you patched how many cells?

As a patch-clamp electrophysiology, I am absolutely staggered by the prospect of patching that many neurons. And to collect those numbers while attempting (and succeeding) in simultaneously patching up to 8 neurons… These folks are crazy.

Take a look at Figure 3, in which the authors characterize the connectivity between 7 simultaneously recorded neurons. Oh, and did I mention that the authors recovered the anatomy of the vast majority of their interneurons and pyramidal cells – 85% and 99%, respectively. (I’ve got a hit rate of 50-60%, on good day. Damn people.)

Figure 3 (Jiang et al 2012)

Technically, this paper is ridiculously impressive, in a “damn-how-long-did-that-take-you-no-wait-how-did-you-do-that-um-can-I-buy-you-a-patch-clamp-machine-please” way. And the science is pretty cool too (although again, I’ve not yet finished the paper, so “pretty cool too” should be seen as an initial impression only. And an understatement.).

But seriously, Xiaolong Jiang, Guangfu Wang, Alice J Lee, Ruth L Stornetta, and lab head J Julius Zhang have produced a paper of breathtaking technical mastery of patch clamp physiology. We all should read it and appreciate their hard, hard work. And then get them one of these: http://autopatcher.org/

Jiang, Wang, Lee, Stornetta and Zhu (2013). The organization of two new cortical interneuronal circuits. Nature Neuroscience, 16(2): 210-218. doi:10.1038/nn.3305. Available online here.

2 Comments /Source

Astra Bryant

Astra Bryant is a graduate of the Stanford Neuroscience PhD program in the labs of Drs. Eric Knudsen and John Huguenard. She used in vitro slice electrophysiology to study the cellular and synaptic mechanisms linking cholinergic signaling and gamma oscillations – two processes critical for the control of gaze and attention, which are disrupted in many psychiatric disorders. She is a senior editor and the webmaster of the NeuWrite West Neuroblog

Society for Neuroscience Waves Goodbye to the Big Easy

Society for Neuroscience Waves Goodbye to the Big Easy

This October, Bourbon Street was crowded with happy neuroscientists attending the Society for Neuroscience's Annual Meeting. They were celebrating successful talks and poster sessions, meeting up with old friends and colleagues, and getting reacquainted with a city that SfN had not visited since 2003. It was a scientific meeting punctuated by visits to the jazz and barbecue festival, alligator tours by swamp-boat, sips of sazerac and beignets by the bagful overlooking the meandering Mississippi. At the end of the conference, many celebrated what seemed like a fresh start to the relationship between the Society and the Big Easy. Unfortunately, this visit may have been a last farewell instead.

Read More

(Fiscal) Cliff Notes

(Fiscal) Cliff Notes

It appears that Congress is doing a pretty good Wile E. Coyote impression.

On Jan 1, 2013, Congress passed the American Taxpayer Relief Act (ATRA) of 2012, which (among other provisions) ended the Bush tax cuts for citizens making more than $400,000, extended federal unemployment benefits for another year... and put off resolving the budget sequestration issue until March 1. So we absolutely did not go over the cliff. Nope, no-sirree. Glad we avoided that. (That is, as long as we don’t look down...)

Read More

Ph.Ds in Press

SNP-Logo-e1368051496475.png

Part 3 in a semi-annual feature, highlighting recently published articles featuring an author (or authors) who is a current member of the Stanford Neuroscience Ph.D program. (Part 1, Part 2) [Note regarding the mechanics of this feature: This is purely through the magic of an ongoing My NCBI search for the names of Neuro PhD students. I wouldn't be surprised if there were some false negatives in the data set. Neuro students - let me know if I've missed your paper, and I'll gladly add it.]

Without further ado, and with many congratulations to the authors, the papers:

First Author papers:

Magali Arons: Autism-associated mutations in ProSAP2/Shank3 impair synaptic transmission and neurexin-neuroligin-mediated transsynaptic signaling (Arons et al 2012). **Thesis Research**

Corbett Bennett and Sergio Arroyo (co-first authors): Mechanisms generating dual-component nicotinic EPSCs in cortical interneurons (Bennett et al 2012).

Mridu Kapur: Calcium tips the balance: a microtubule plus end to lattice binding switch operates in the carboxyl terminus of BPAG1n4 (Kapur et al 2012)

Kira Mosher: Neural progenitor cells regulate microglia functions and activity (Mosher et al 2012).

Suraj Pardhan: Commentary: Progressive inflammation as a contributing factor to early development of Parkinson's disease (Pradhan and Andreasson 2012).

Rohit Prakash: Two-photon optogenetic toolbox for fast inhibition, excitation and bistable modulation. (Prakash et al 2012)

Matthew Sacchet:

Second through n-th Author papers:

Dominic Berns: Mechanisms generating dual-component nicotinic EPSCs in cortical interneurons (Bennett et al 2012).

Michael Betley: Input-specific control of reward and aversion in the ventral tegmental area (Lammel et al 2012).

Gregor Bieri: Neural progenitor cells regulate microglia functions and activity (Mosher et al 2012).

Emily Ferenczi: Dopamine neurons modulation neural encoding and expression of depression-related behaviour (Tye et al 2012).

Matt Figley: Inhibition of RNA lariat debranching enzyme suppresses TDP-43 toxicity in ALS disease models (Armakola et al 2012)

William Joo: The transcriptional regulator lola is required for stem cell maintenance and germ cell differentiation in the Drosophila testis (Davies et al 2012).

Sung-Yon Kim:

  • Dopamine neurons modulation neural encoding and expression of depression-related behaviour (Tye et al 2012).
  • A prefrontal cortex-brainstem neuronal projection that controls response to behavioural challenge (Warden et al 2012).

Ivan Millan:

  • Calcium tips the balance: a microtubule plus end to lattice binding switch operates in the carboxyl terminus of BPAG1n4 (Kapur et al 2012)
  • Parkinson's disease-associated kinase PINK1 regulates Miro protein level and axonal transport of mitochondria (Liu et al 2012)

Matthew Sacchet: Toward an affective neuroscience account of financial risk taking (Wu et al 2012).

 

First Author Papers

Arons, Thynne, Grabrucker, Li, Schoen, Cheyne, Boeckers, Montgomery, Garner (2012). Autism-associated mutations in ProSAP2/Shank3 impair synaptic transmission and neurexin-neuroligin-mediated transsynaptic signaling. J Neurosci 32(43): 14966-78. (Link)

Abstract: Mutations in several postsynaptic proteins have recently been implicated in the molecular pathogenesis of autism and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), including Neuroligins, Neurexins, and members of the ProSAP/Shank family, thereby suggesting that these genetic forms of autism may share common synaptic mechanisms. Initial studies of ASD-associated mutations in ProSAP2/Shank3 support a role for this protein in glutamate receptor function and spine morphology, but these synaptic phenotypes are not universally penetrant, indicating that other core facets of ProSAP2/Shank3 function must underlie synaptic deficits in patients with ASDs. In the present study, we have examined whether the ability of ProSAP2/Shank3 to interact with the cytoplasmic tail of Neuroligins functions to coordinate pre/postsynaptic signaling through the Neurexin-Neuroligin signaling complex in hippocampal neurons of Rattus norvegicus. Indeed, we find that synaptic levels of ProSAP2/Shank3 regulate AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission and induce widespread changes in the levels of presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins via Neurexin-Neuroligin transsynaptic signaling. ASD-associated mutations in ProSAP2/Shank3 disrupt not only postsynaptic AMPA and NMDA receptor signaling but also interfere with the ability of ProSAP2/Shank3 to signal across the synapse to alter presynaptic structure and function. These data indicate that ASD-associated mutations in a subset of synaptic proteins may target core cellular pathways that coordinate the functional matching and maturation of excitatory synapses in the CNS.

Back to top

 

Bennett, Arroyo, Berns, Hestrin (2012). Mechanisms generating dual-component nicotinic EPSCs in cortical interneurons. J Neurosci 32(48): 17287-96. (Link).

Abstract: Activation of cortical nicotinic receptors by cholinergic axons from the basal forebrain (BF) significantly impacts cortical function, and the loss of nicotinic receptors is a hallmark of aging and neurodegenerative disease. We have previously shown that stimulation of BF axons generates a fast α7 and a slow non-α7 receptor-dependent response in cortical interneurons. However, the synaptic mechanisms that underlie this dual-component nicotinic response remain unclear. Here, we report that fast α7 receptor-mediated EPSCs in the mouse cortex are highly variable and insensitive to perturbations of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), while slow non-α7 receptor-mediated EPSCs are reliable and highly sensitive to AChE activity. Based on these data, we propose that the fast and slow nicotinic responses reflect differences in synaptic structure between cholinergic varicosities activating α7 and non-α7 classes of nicotinic receptors.

Back to top

 

Kapur, Wang, Maloney, Millan, Lundin, Tran and Yang (2012). Calcium tips the balance: a microtubule plus end to lattice binding switch operates in the carboxyl terminus of BPAG1n4. EMBO reports 13, 1021-1029. (Link)

Abstract: Microtubules (MTs) are integral to numerous cellular functions, such as cell adhesion, differentiation and intracellular transport. Their dynamics are largely controlled by diverse MT-interacting proteins, but the signalling mechanisms that regulate these interactions remain elusive. In this report, we identify a rapid, calcium-regulated switch between MT plus end interaction and lattice binding within the carboxyl terminus of BPAG1n4. This switch is EF-hand dependent, and mutations of the EF-hands abolish this dynamic behaviour. Our study thus uncovers a new, calcium-dependent regulatory mechanism for a spectraplakin, BPAG1n4, at the MT plus end.

Back to top

 

Mosher, Andres, Fukuhara, Bieri, Hasegawa-Moriyama, He, Guzman, Wyss-Coray (2012). Neural progenitor cells regulate microglia functions and activity. Nat Neurosci 15(11): 1485-7. (Link)

Abstract: We found mouse neural progenitor cells (NPCs) to have a secretory protein profile distinct from other brain cells and to modulate microglial activation, proliferation and phagocytosis. NPC-derived vascular endothelial growth factor was necessary and sufficient to exert at least some of these effects in mice. Thus, neural precursor cells may not only be shaped by microglia, but also regulate microglia functions and activity.

Back to top

 

Pradhan and Andreasson (2012). Commentary: Progressive Inflammation as a contributing factor to early development of Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. pii: S0014-4886(12)00456-6. (Link)

Abstract: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with three cardinal features of pathology: 1. Aggregation of α-synuclein into intraneuronal structures called Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites. 2. Dysregulated immune activation in the substantia nigra (SN). 3. Degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal circuit. The largely correlative nature of evidence in humans has precluded a decisive verdict on the relationship between α-synuclein pathology, inflammation, and neuronal damage. Furthermore, it is unclear whether inflammation plays a role in the early prodromal stages of PD before neuronal damage has occurred and Parkinsonian motor symptoms become apparent. To gain insight into the interaction between the inflammatory response and the development of neuronal pathology in PD, Watson et al. characterized neuroinflammation in a wild-type α-synuclein overexpressing mouse model of prodromal PD. They demonstrate, for the first time, the existence of early and sustained microglial mediated innate inflammation that precedes damage to the nigrostriatal circuit. Additionally they observe the spread of inflammation from the striatum to the SN. This study suggests that early dysregulated inflammation may contribute to progressive nigrostriatal pathology in PD, although the initiating factor that triggers the inflammatory response remains elusive. The novel concept of an early inflammatory response in the development of PD has important implications for preventive and therapeutic strategies for PD.

Back to top

 

Prakash, Yizhar, Grewe, Ramakrishnan, Wang, Goshen, Packer, Peterka, Yuste, Schnitzer, Deisseroth (2012). Two-photon optogenetic toolbox for fast inhibition, excitation and bistable modulation. Nat Methods, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2215. (Link).

Abstract: Optogenetics with microbial opsin genes has enabled high-speed control of genetically specified cell populations in intact tissue. However, it remains a challenge to independently control subsets of cells within the genetically targeted population. Although spatially precise excitation of target molecules can be achieved using two-photon laser-scanning microscopy (TPLSM) hardware, the integration of two-photon excitation with optogenetics has thus far required specialized equipment or scanning and has not yet been widely adopted. Here we take a complementary approach, developing opsins with custom kinetic, expression and spectral properties uniquely suited to scan times typical of the raster approach that is ubiquitous in TPLSM laboratories. We use a range of culture, slice and mammalian in vivo preparations to demonstrate the versatility of this toolbox, and we quantitatively map parameter space for fast excitation, inhibition and bistable control. Together these advances may help enable broad adoption of integrated optogenetic and TPLSM technologies across experimental fields and systems.

Back to top

 

Sacchet and Knutson (2012). Spatial smoothing systematically biases the localization of reward-related brain activity. Neuroimage 66C:270-277. (Link)

Abstract: Neuroimaging methods with enhanced spatial resolution such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) suggest that the subcortical striatum plays a critical role in human reward processing. Analysis of FMRI data requires several preprocessing steps, some of which entail tradeoffs. For instance, while spatial smoothing can enhance statistical power, it may also bias localization towards regions that contain more gray than white matter. In a meta-analysis and reanalysis of an existing dataset, we sought to determine whether spatial smoothing could systematically bias the spatial localization of foci related to reward anticipation in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). An activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta-analysis revealed that peak ventral striatal ALE foci for studies that used smaller spatial smoothing kernels (i.e. <6mm FWHM) were more anterior than those identified for studies that used larger kernels (i.e. >7mm FWHM). Additionally, subtraction analysis of findings for studies that used smaller versus larger smoothing kernels revealed a significant cluster of differential activity in the left relatively anterior NAcc (Talairach coordinates: -10, 9, -1). A second meta-analysis revealed that larger smoothing kernels were correlated with more posterior localizations of NAcc activation foci (p<0.015), but revealed no significant associations with other potentially relevant parameters (including voxel volume, magnet strength, and publication date). Finally, repeated analysis of a representative dataset processed at different smoothing kernels (i.e., 0-12mm) also indicated that smoothing systematically yielded more posterior activation foci in the NAcc (p<0.005). Taken together, these findings indicate that spatial smoothing can systematically bias the spatial localization of striatal activity. These findings have implications both for historical interpretation of past findings related to reward processing and for the analysis of future studies.

Back to top

 

Sacchet, Mellinger, Sitaram, Braun, Birbaumer, Fetz (2012). Volitional control of neuromagnetic coherence. Front Neurosci. 6: 189. (Link)

Abstract: Coherence of neural activity between circumscribed brain regions has been implicated as an indicator of intracerebral communication in various cognitive processes. While neural activity can be volitionally controlled with neurofeedback, the volitional control of coherence has not yet been explored. Learned volitional control of coherence could elucidate mechanisms of associations between cortical areas and its cognitive correlates and may have clinical implications. Neural coherence may also provide a signal for brain-computer interfaces (BCI). In the present study we used the Weighted Overlapping Segment Averaging method to assess coherence between bilateral magnetoencephalograph sensors during voluntary digit movement as a basis for BCI control. Participants controlled an onscreen cursor, with a success rate of 124 of 180 (68.9%, sign-test p < 0.001) and 84 out of 100 (84%, sign-test p < 0.001). The present findings suggest that neural coherence may be volitionally controlled and may have specific behavioral correlates.

Back to top

Second through n-th Author Papers

Armakola, Higgins, Figley, Barmada, Scarborough, Diaz, Fang, Shorter, Krogan, Finkbeiner, Farese, Gitler (2012). Inhibition of RNA lariat debranching enzyme suppresses TDP-43 toxicity in ALS disease models. Nat Genet. 44(12): 1302-9. (Link)

Abstract: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease primarily affecting motor neurons. Mutations in the gene encoding TDP-43 cause some forms of the disease, and cytoplasmic TDP-43 aggregates accumulate in degenerating neurons of most individuals with ALS. Thus, strategies aimed at targeting the toxicity of cytoplasmic TDP-43 aggregates may be effective. Here, we report results from two genome-wide loss-of-function TDP-43 toxicity suppressor screens in yeast. The strongest suppressor of TDP-43 toxicity was deletion of DBR1, which encodes an RNA lariat debranching enzyme. We show that, in the absence of Dbr1 enzymatic activity, intronic lariats accumulate in the cytoplasm and likely act as decoys to sequester TDP-43, preventing it from interfering with essential cellular RNAs and RNA-binding proteins. Knockdown of Dbr1 in a human neuronal cell line or in primary rat neurons is also sufficient to rescue TDP-43 toxicity. Our findings provide insight into TDP-43-mediated cytotoxicity and suggest that decreasing Dbr1 activity could be a potential therapeutic approach for ALS.

Back to top

 

Davies, Lim, Joo, Tam, Fuller (2012). The transcriptional regulator lola is required for stem cell maintenance and germ cell differentiation in the Drosophila testis. Dev Bio 373(2): 310-21. (Link)

Abstract: Stem cell behavior is regulated by extrinsic signals from specialized microenvironments, or niches, and intrinsic factors required for execution of context-appropriate responses to niche signals. Here we show that function of the transcriptional regulator longitudinals lacking (lola) is required cell autonomously for germline stem cell and somatic cyst stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila testis. In addition, lola is also required for proper execution of key developmental transitions during male germ cell differentiation, including the switch from transit amplifying progenitor to spermatocyte growth and differentiation, as well as meiotic cell cycle progression and spermiogenesis. Different lola isoforms, each having unique C-termini and zinc finger domains, may control different aspects of proliferation and differentiation in the male germline and somatic cyst stem cell lineages.

Back to top

 

Lammel, Lim, Ran, Huang, Betley, Tye, Deisseroth, Malenka (2012). Input-specific control of reward and aversion in the ventral tegmental area. Nature 491(7423):212-7. (Link)

Abstract: Ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine neurons have important roles in adaptive and pathological brain functions related to reward and motivation. However, it is unknown whether subpopulations of VTA dopamine neurons participate in distinct circuits that encode different motivational signatures, and whether inputs to the VTA differentially modulate such circuits. Here we show that, because of differences in synaptic connectivity, activation of inputs to the VTA from the laterodorsal tegmentum and the lateral habenula elicit reward and aversion in mice, respectively. Laterodorsal tegmentum neurons preferentially synapse on dopamine neurons projecting to the nucleus accumbens lateral shell, whereas lateral habenula neurons synapse primarily on dopamine neurons projecting to the medial prefrontal cortex as well as on GABAergic (γ-aminobutyric-acid-containing) neurons in the rostromedial tegmental nucleus. These results establish that distinct VTA circuits generate reward and aversion, and thereby provide a new framework for understanding the circuit basis of adaptive and pathological motivated behaviours.

Back to top

 

Liu, Sawada, Lee, Yu, Silverio, Alapatt, Millan, Shen, Saxton, Kanao, Takahashi, Hattori, Imai, Lu (2012). Parkinson's disease-associated kinase PINK1 regulates Miro protein level and axonal transport of mitochondria. PLoS Genet. 8(3): e1002537. (Link)

Abstract: Mutations in Pten-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are linked to early-onset familial Parkinson's disease (FPD). PINK1 has previously been implicated in mitochondrial fission/fusion dynamics, quality control, and electron transport chain function. However, it is not clear how these processes are interconnected and whether they are sufficient to explain all aspects of PINK1 pathogenesis. Here we show that PINK1 also controls mitochondrial motility. InDrosophila, downregulation of dMiro or other components of the mitochondrial transport machinery rescued dPINK1 mutant phenotypes in the muscle and dopaminergic (DA) neurons, whereas dMiro overexpression alone caused DA neuron loss. dMiro protein level was increased in dPINK1 mutant but decreased in dPINK1 or dParkin overexpression conditions. In Drosophila larval motor neurons, overexpression of dPINK1 inhibited axonal mitochondria transport in both anterograde and retrograde directions, whereas dPINK1 knockdown promoted anterograde transport. In HeLa cells, overexpressed hPINK1 worked together with hParkin, another FPD gene, to regulate the ubiquitination and degradation of hMiro1 and hMiro2, apparently in a Ser-156 phosphorylation-independent manner. Also in HeLa cells, loss of hMiro promoted the perinuclear clustering of mitochondria and facilitated autophagy of damaged mitochondria, effects previously associated with activation of the PINK1/Parkin pathway. These newly identified functions of PINK1/Parkin and Miro in mitochondrial transport and mitophagy contribute to our understanding of the complex interplays in mitochondrial quality control that are critically involved in PD pathogenesis, and they may explain the peripheral neuropathy symptoms seen in some PD patients carrying particular PINK1 or Parkinmutations. Moreover, the different effects of loss of PINK1 function on Miro protein level inDrosophila and mouse cells may offer one explanation of the distinct phenotypic manifestations of PINK1 mutants in these two species.

Back to top

 

Tye, Mirzabekov, Warden, Ferenczi, Tsai, Finkelstein, Kim, Adhikari, Thompson, Andalman, Gunaydin, Witten, Deisseroth (2012). Dopamine neurons modulate neural encoding and expression of depression-related behaviour. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature11740. (Link)

Abstract: Major depression is characterized by diverse debilitating symptoms that include hopelessness and anhedonia. Dopamine neurons involved in reward and motivation are among many neural populations that have been hypothesized to be relevant, and certain antidepressant treatments, including medications and brain stimulation therapies, can influence the complex dopamine system. Until now it has not been possible to test this hypothesis directly, even in animal models, as existing therapeutic interventions are unable to specifically target dopamine neurons. Here we investigated directly the causal contributions of defined dopamine neurons to multidimensional depression-like phenotypes induced by chronic mild stress, by integrating behavioural, pharmacological, optogenetic and electrophysiological methods in freely moving rodents. We found that bidirectional control (inhibition or excitation) of specified midbrain dopamine neurons immediately and bidirectionally modulates (induces or relieves) multiple independent depression symptoms caused by chronic stress. By probing the circuit implementation of these effects, we observed that optogenetic recruitment of these dopamine neurons potently alters the neural encoding of depression-related behaviours in the downstream nucleus accumbens of freely moving rodents, suggesting that processes affecting depression symptoms may involve alterations in the neural encoding of action in limbic circuitry.

Back to top

 

Warden, Selimbeyoglu, Mirzabekov, Lo, Thompson, Kim, Adhikari, Tye, Frank, Deisseroth (2012). A prefrontal cortex-brainstem neuronal projection that controls response to behavioural challenge. Nature 492(7429):428-32. (Link).

Abstract: The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is thought to participate in high-level control of the generation of behaviours (including the decision to execute actions); indeed, imaging and lesion studies in human beings have revealed that PFC dysfunction can lead to either impulsive states with increased tendency to initiate action, or to amotivational states characterized by symptoms such as reduced activity, hopelessness and depressed mood. Considering the opposite valence of these two phenotypes as well as the broad complexity of other tasks attributed to PFC, we sought to elucidate the PFC circuitry that favours effortful behavioural responses to challenging situations. Here we develop and use a quantitative method for the continuous assessment and control of active response to a behavioural challenge, synchronized with single-unit electrophysiology and optogenetics in freely moving rats. In recording from the medial PFC (mPFC), we observed that many neurons were not simply movement-related in their spike-firing patterns but instead were selectively modulated from moment to moment, according to the animal's decision to act in a challenging situation. Surprisingly, we next found that direct activation of principal neurons in the mPFC had no detectable causal effect on this behaviour. We tested whether this behaviour could be causally mediated by only a subclass of mPFC cells defined by specific downstream wiring. Indeed, by leveraging optogenetic projection-targeting to control cells with specific efferent wiring patterns, we found that selective activation of those mPFC cells projecting to the brainstem dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), a serotonergic nucleus implicated in major depressive disorder, induced a profound, rapid and reversible effect on selection of the active behavioural state. These results may be of importance in understanding the neural circuitry underlying normal and pathological patterns of action selection and motivation in behaviour.

Back to top

 

Wu, Sacchet, Knuston (2012). Toward an affective neuroscience account of financial risk taking. Front Neurosci 6: 159. (

Congratulations Mr. President! Now, look out! We're headed for a cliff!

This week, we can celebrate the reelection of a president who is a friend to science, a president who has learned (we hope) about the tough balance between principal and compromise, a president who must now continue fight with the fervor he showed in the last weeks of the campaign for a progressive future for America. Celebrate we should, but we must also harness the passion and concern for our country’s future that this close election kindled in our political souls and not allow it to dissipate into apathy, because there is crucial work for us to do as citizen scientists in the months ahead.

Read More

Dr. Saul Villeda, you are proper famous.

Hat tip to Kelly Z. for alerting me that recent Stanford alumn (and current USCF Faculty Fellow) Saul Villeda has been enjoying some recent press coverage. For those of you unfamiliar with Saul's thesis work, I'm going to lift the description of Saul's research interests straight from the his lab website:

Our lab is interested in understanding what drives regenerative and cognitive impairments in the aging brain, and moreover how the effects of aging can be reversed in the old brain. Our lab is focused on three areas. First, we are looking at how immune-related changes in old blood contribute to impairments in neural stem cell function and associated cognitive functions. Second, we are looking at the contribution of the innate immune system to age-related impairments in synaptic plasticity and cognitive function. Third, we are looking at how exposure to young blood rejuvenates neural stem cell function, synaptic plasticity and cognitive function in the old brain. Ultimately, our goal is to elucidate cellular and molecular mechanisms that promote brain rejuvenation as a means by which to combat age-related neurodegeneration and cognitive dysfunction. (Villeda lab website)

And now, on to the press coverage of Saul's research, which he recently presented at the Society for Neuroscience Conference.

Saul: I think I speak for the entire Stanford Neuro student community, when I saw congratulations on your new fame. We're so proud. And amused. But mostly pretty darn proud.

Final note: those curious for more details may want to peruse Saul's Nature paper (found online here, although pay-wall warning).

Final, final note: The Villeda lab is looking for folks to join their research group! Qualified individuals should head on over to the Villeda lab website for contact details.

Update 10/22/12: The fame, it spreads. I09 picks up the story from the Guardian.